CREATION
VS
Evolution


Items of use for the Creationist in the
"Creation / Evolution"
Debate

by Clifford Scott

 


 

Defining the Terms

Creation or evolution ?

Who Do You Believe ?

Problems with the Big Bang

Primordial Soup ?

Are There Any Vestigial Entities ?

When Was the Origin of Man ?

On the (REAL) Origin of the Species

The Radiometric Dating Game

Recipe for Disaster

Mountain of Trouble

Miller / Urey "Frankenstein" Experiment

Creatures that Defy Evolution

Dinosaur and Man

Could Dinosaurs Have Really Turned Into Birds ?

Three Things that Puzzle NASA

Design Demands a Designer

TED Talks: 2002 - Engineering & Evolution

TED Talks: 2006 - Strange Beliefs

TED Talks: 2009 - Surgery's Past

TED Talks: 2011 - Big History

Distant Galaxies

Comets and the Oort Cloud

Saturn: Big Planet - Big Problems

Mathematics: Man-Made or Intelligently Designed?

David's Question

Science in the Bible

Some Very Handy Words for the Creationist

The Probability that Evolution Actually Happened

 

WHAT IF...?

 


 

DEFINING THE TERMS

"Good and bad, I define these terms
Quite clear, no doubt, somehow..." *

They said, "The world is so much older," but
It's younger than that now.

* Bob Dylan. My Back Pages
Copyright © 1964 by Warner Bros. Inc.;
renewed 1992 by Special Rider Music.

Before you talk about CREATION and EVOLUTION
you need to define the terms.

Each of the following definitions
is the FIRST entry you find on Google.

CREATION
noun: the action or process
of bringing something into existence.

EVOLUTION
noun: the process by which different kinds
of living organisms are
thought
to have developed and diversified from earlier forms
during the history of the earth.

SCIENCE
noun: the intellectual and practical activity
encompassing the systematic study of the structure
and behavior of the physical and natural world through
observation
and
experiment.

SCIENTIFIC FACT
noun: an observation that has been confirmed
repeatedly
and is accepted as true
(although its truth is never final)

THEORY
noun: a supposition
or a system of ideas
intended to explain something,
especially one based on general principles
independent of the thing to be explained.

SCIENTIFIC THEORY
noun: a theory that explains scientific observations;
"scientific theories must be falsifiable"

MICRO-EVOLUTION
noun: evolutionary change
within a species
or small group of organisms,
especially over a short period.

VARIATION
noun: a change or difference
in condition, amount, or level,
typically with certain limits.

MACRO-EVOLUTION
noun: major evolutionary change.
The term applies mainly to the evolution
of whole taxonomic groups
over long periods of time.

SPECIES
noun: a group of living organisms
consisting of similar individuals
capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding.
IE: a horse can breed with a zebra and produce a zorse.

BIBLICAL KIND
noun: animals...in groups...that cannot interbreed.
IE: a horse cannot breed
with a cow or a jellyfish or a carrot.

 


 

Be aware that evolutionists are slippery rascals.
They will point to VARIATION or MICRO-EVOLUTION
and then claim it means MACRO-EVOLUTION
from ape to man
through a common ancestor.

They will point to Darwin's observation of finches
and then claim that birds evolved from dinosaurs.

When Darwin observed the Galapagos finches,
he saw different beak sizes and shapes
and then jumped to the conclusion
that MACRO-EVOLUTION happens,
a very unscientific conclusion.

 


 

An obvious evolutionist wrote the following to me:
"In science, theory is the ultimate goal, the explanation.
It's as close to proven as anything in science can be."

This person does not appear
to understand the difference between
THEORETICAL
and
ACTUAL

So I propose he try the following experiment:

Step off the edge of a tall building or mountain cliff.
Did you
THEORETICALLY
or
ACTUALLY
fall to your death?

Did gravity theoretically or actually work?

You will find this experiment to be very SCIENTIFIC.

It will work EVERY time!

Except that the Biblical book of Hebrews 9:27
limits the number of times this can be done
to once.

 

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

CREATION OR EVOLUTION ?

CREATION and EVOLUTION
both contain a theory about mankind's origin.
Our origin is something that no man
could ever have seen.

However, we DO have an
Eyewitness
account of our origin.
It is found in the 1st and 2nd chapters
of the book of Genesis
in the Bible.

Creationists invite you
to examine this Eyewitness account.

Any judge would consider an advocate
to be very incompetent
if he chose to ignore
an Eyewitness account
of the event that he proposes!

 


 

Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson
makes the following statement:

"Not that anybody asked,
but I object to religion in science classrooms.
Not because it's religion,
but because it's not science." *

I completely agree.

However...

Website geek Clifford Scott
makes the following statement:

"Not that anybody asked,
but I object to evolution in science classrooms.
Not because it's evolution,
but because it's not science."

And I'm not talking about "micro-evolution"
which is NOT evolution
but merely variation within a species.

I'm talking about "macro-evolution"
the THEORY that says
"creatures can become more complex
through accumulated mutations"
a process that has
NEVER been observed.

Something that has NEVER been observed is not
SCIENCE
and does NOT belong in the science classroom!

 

However
if the THEORY of evolution
is permitted in the science classroom
then the alternate THEORY of Creation should be also!


Thank you Neil deGrasse Tyson
for your great insight
and this great statement!

* https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/329265354918465536

 


 

THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE

Astronomers have determined
that the universe is expanding
like a balloon expanding by someone blowing into it.
They have measured
the rate of expansion of the universe.
From these measurements
they mathematically reverse the expansion
back to a singularity, a point so small it can't be seen.
According to evolution
this singularity somehow exploded.
And that was the beginning of the universe.

PROBLEMS

1. A balloon does not go back to a singularity.
It goes back to its original size
when Someone started blowing into it.

2. How did this alleged singularity explode?
Who or What caused this explosion?
An explosion needs a cause, it needs energy.
Where did these come from?

Evolution has no answers to these questions.

Creation does.

The beginning of the universe is
indeed
very much like the expansion of a balloon.
SOMEONE is God.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE ?

Someone once made the humorous statement:
"I wouldn't have seen it
if I hadn't believed it!"

This really applies to evolutionists!

However it also applies to Creationists.

We all see what we want to believe.
There's nothing wrong with that ...
as long as you know WHO you believe!

Do you believe in mostly dead dudes like,
Leclerc.
Lamarck.
Lyell.
Darwin.
Dawkins?

Or do you believe the All-Mighty Creator God?

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

BIG PROBLEMS WITH THE BIG BANG


THE BIG BANG ?

There are many MANY problems with the
BIG BANG THEORY

Here are just a few:
If the "Big Bang" explosion
sent matter moving outward
in an ever-expanding trajectory

Then what made some things REVERSE
and start moving inward
to coelesce into stars and planets?

And finally,
If forces were moving inward and
condensing into planets

Then why is our
MOON
moving outward
and getting farther away from the Earth?

These are PROBLEMS
for the Big Bang theory

But NOT for the
CREATION
theory!

 


 

In 1927
Georges Lemaitre
noted that the expanding universe
could be traced back to a single point.

In 1929
Edwin Hubble
discovered that all galaxies
are drifting apart at high speeds.

Both of these gentlemen
should have already known this.
Because they could have read about it
in the Bible books
of Isaiah and Jeremiah.

Isaiah (who lived about 740-681 BC) wrote:

"Thus says God the Lord,
Who created the heavens
and stretched them out..."
Isaiah 42:5

"It is I Who made the earth,
and created man upon it,
I stretched out the heavens with My hands..."
Isaiah 45:12

"That you have forgotten the Lord your Maker,
Who stretched out the heavens
and laid the foundations of the earth..."
Isaiah 51:13

Jeremiah (who lived about 664-525 BC) wrote:

"It is He Who made the earth by His power,
Who established the world by His wisdom,
and by His understanding
He stretched out the heavens."
Jeremiah 10:12 and 51:15

The big bang theory
says that since the universe is expanding
it must have started at a central point
BILLIONS and BILLIONS of years ago.

The Bible says that God created the universe
and stretched out the heavens
about 6000 years ago.

The universe didn't start with a central point.

It started with a central Person.

God.

 


 

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE

Your mission, should you choose to accept it:

* Build a complex unit ...
* Capable of sensing the environment around it ...
  by visual, auditory, touch, smell, and taste;
* Capable of moving itself;
* Capable of communicating with other units;
* Capable of billion "JigaHertz" computing;
* Capable of learning completely new functions;
* Capable of designing and building complex structures;
* AND
* Capable of manufacturing a small version of itself,
  inside of itself,
  that will be able to eventually become full size,
  by itself,
  while being over 90% functional at every stage in between;
* AND
* The only tool you are allowed to use ... Dynamite !!!

OH ... never mind.
ACCORDING TO EVOLUTIONISTS ...

THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE.

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

 

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

PRIMORDIAL SOUP ?

If you would like a can of PRIMORDIAL SOUP

You will have to find a different website.
(I suggest you try Fairy Tale websites)

However, if you would like an EMPTY
Primordial Soup can
you can get one here.

Click on soup can pix above
for instructions on how to make or order an
EMPTY
Primordial Soup can
to use in your classes about Creation Vs evolution.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

ARE THERE ANY VESTIGIAL STRUCTURES ?

At one time evolutionists stated there were 180
VESTIGIAL
structures in the human body.

These included:
muscles of the ear
wisdom teeth
appendix
tail bone (coccyx)
and body hair
among others.

It is not the intent of this section
to examine each of these.

Suffice it to say
that if it were left up to the mind-set
of the evolutionist
NOTHING
would be known about any of these structures.

The Creationist says
"I am fearfully and wonderfully made."
See Psalm 139:14

The Creationist mind-set
whether used by a
Creationist
or an
evolutionist
was responsible
for discovering the uses of these
"VESTIGIAL"
structures.

IRONICALLY
THE ONLY THINGS DOOMED TO BECOME
VESTIGIAL

ARE ATHEISTIC EVOLUTIONISTS.

You don't have to be one.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

WHEN WAS THE ORIGIN OF MAN ?

Evolution says man first appeared
200,000 years ago. #
Creation says man first appeared
about 6000 years ago. ##

These two dates are quite different.
Let's see what history has to say:

"The span of recorded history is roughly 5,000 years,
with Sumerian Cuneiform script,
the oldest discovered form of coherent writing,
from the protoliterate period
around the 30th century BC." *

"From the 1st dynasty 3100-2890 BC
to the 8th dynasty 2181-2125 BC
Egyptian dating is expressed by ruling families -
dynasties.
The historian Manetho (270 BC)
wrote a history of Egypt giving
the number of dynasties, the number of kings,
their names and the length of each reign." **

"Sumer, or the 'land of civilized kings'
flourished in Mesopotamia,
now modern-day Iraq, around 4500 BC.
The Sumerian creation myth
can be found on a tablet in Nippur,
an ancient Mesopotamian city
founded in approximately 5000 BC." ***

# http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm

## Genesis 1:26-28

* Jemdet Nasr period, Kish tablet;
also The Origin and Development of the Cuneiform System of Writing,
by Samuel Noah Kramer,
and Thirty Nine Firsts In Recorded History, pp 381-383.
by Samuel Noah Kramer.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history

** http://www.discoveringegypt.com/dynasty1.htm

*** http://www.ancient-origins.net/human-origins-folklore/
origins-human-beings-according-ancient-sumerian-texts-0065

Historical documents state
that man's recorded history started between
3000 and 5000 B.C. !

IT APPEARS THAT HISTORY POINTS
MUCH CLOSER
TO THE CREATION ACCOUNT
THAN TO THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION !


HUMAN POPULATION

Human population growth rate and death rate
is more consistent with a starting date
of several thousand years ago.
NOT 200,000 years ago as evolution maintains.

Look at any World Population Chart
and try to imagine a human population
existing for 200,000 years
WITHOUT GROWING
until 1950 A.D.

The only way any 200,000 year chart could make sense
is if it contained some MAJOR CATASTROPHES.
And we DO have a record of just such a catastrophe.
It is found in the biblical book of Genesis.
Read Genesis chapters 6, 7, and 8 -
the Flood of Noah's time.

But evolution has a problem with this recorded account.
If the Flood is true,
then the rest of Genesis is true,
and then the rest of the Bible is true.

And that for some reason is untenable for evolutionists.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

ON THE (REAL) ORIGIN OF SPECIES

Click above image to access a downloadable JPG image
that can be printed and/or photocopied.
After photocopying, fold the 8.5X11 paper in quarters
OR copy on two sides (tumbled), cut in half, then fold.

Pass these out at schools, libraries, stores, offices,
EVERYWHERE!

(When you are finished downloading the JPG file,
click your "BACK" button to return to this page)

 


 

A PRINCESS KISSING A FROG
AND TURNING IT INTO A PRINCE

is considered a childish fairy tale...

But replace the princess with "time" and it's science?

No way.

A frog will never turn into a prince.

Never in a million billion gazillion years!

 


 

"APE-MAN" CHART

Copy this chart and hand it out everywhere.

 


 

EVOLUTION ICON ?

Copy this picture and pass it out at school!

 


 

ANCESTRY.COM

I checked with the huge online genealogy site
which has 12.7 Billion records
containing 8 Billion names.
As of 2014 the database contains only 26 people named
"Apeman."
And half of those were listed with a different surname,
but corrected by someone else to read "Apeman".
ALL of the "Apeman" people were humans
who happened to have the surname of Apeman.

People (humans) have a great sense of humor.
In 1880 someone named their son "Harry Apeman".
In 1930 he lived in New Jersey.
He was a man.

 


 

TARZAN THE APEMAN

Tarzan was a fictional character created in 1912 by
Edgar Rice Burroughs.
He was a human.
His name was John Clayton, Earl of Greystoke.
He met an American woman named Jane Porter.
In Burroughs' books Tarzan never grunted,
"Me Tarzan. You Jane."
Though he was raised from infancy by apes,
he taught himself to read
and came to the conclusion
that he was different from the apes.

It would appear that Tarzan was
smarter
than most evolutionists!

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

RADIOMETRIC DATING GAME

On a USGS webpage* the question is asked,
"How do geologists date rocks?"
A better question would be,
"Why do geologists date rocks?"
The answer on the USGS webpage is,
"Radiometric dating!"

The article goes on to explain how
radiometric dating is supposed to work.
However, it fails to mention that
radiometric dating makes several

ASSUMPTIONS**

1. WHAT IT WAS LIKE IN THE "ZERO HOUR."
No geologists (evolutionist or Creationist) were present
when most rocks formed.
So they don't know how many daughter isotopes
the original rock had
alongside the parent radioactive isotopes.
And this is very important!
If you want to do any accurate dating,
you need to know how many daughters are available.

2. THAT NOTHING WAS CONTAMINATED.
We are not dealing with a sealed system here.
All kinds of junk might have crept in,
from rainwater to molten volcanic rocks.
And any of these would really mess up your date.

3. CONSTANT RATE.
Scientists have very carefully
measured radioactive decay rates
over the past 100 years or so
and have found them to be quite constant.
So they ASSUME (ASS U ME)
that they have been this way for
BILLIONS and BILLIONS of years.
However some little crystals in New Mexico granite
have shown that their uranium decay rates have been
250,000 times faster in the past than at present!
If you want to have a consistent dating experience,
you need to know these things.


Recently, Creation magazine reported that ages up to
3.5 million years
were obtained for lava flows that erupted
in New Zealand from 1949 to 1975.***
This represents a margin of error of
5 million %
and more!

 

* http://geomaps.wr.usgs.gov/parks/gtime/radiom.html

** http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v4/n4/assumptions

*** Snelling, A., Radioactive ‘dating’ failure:
Recent New Zealand lava flows
yield ‘ages’ of millions of years.

Accurate dating needs to be a lot more precise than that.

The calculator shown above
has been purposely made to be inaccurate.
The minus sign and the divide sign have been switched.
The calculator adds and multiplies correctly,
but does not subtract or divide accurately.

It has an accuracy rating of 50%,
but you would not use it seriously.
A calculator that is accurate only half of the time is
USELESS!

So why do scientists insist
that radiometric dating methods
are anywhere near accurate?

Actually, the above calculator DOES have a use.
It is a very handy visual aid for pointing out the
INACCURACIES
of Radiometric Dating!

You can find instructions for making one
or you can order one from Clifford Scott for $5.00
(postage included)
by clicking on the above photo.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

RECIPE FOR DISASTER

Take: away prayer and Bible instruction from schools.
Teach: students they are nothing but animals
and mutated pond scum.
Simmer: for a few years.

Results:
1966 University of Texas Massacre - 17 dead, 31 wounded.
1966 Mesa AZ Massacre - 3 dead, 2 wounded.
1974 Olean High School Shooting - 3 dead, 11 wounded.
1976 Cal State Fullerton Shooting - 7 dead, 2 wounded.
1978 Michigan (self-proclaimed NAZI) -
1 dead, 1 wounded.
1979 Cleveland (San Diego, CA) Elem School Shooting -
2 dead, 9 wounded.
1986 Cokeville Elementary School Hostage Crisis -
2 dead, 78 wounded.
1988 Oakland (SC) Elementary School Shooting -
2 dead, 8 wounded.
1989 Cleveland (Stockton, CA) School Massacre -
5 dead, 32 wounded.
1991 University of Iowa Shooting - 5 dead, 1 wounded.
1992 Lindhurst High School Shooting -
4 dead, 10 wounded.
1992 East Carter High School Shooting - 2 dead.
1994 Wickliffe Middle School Shooting -
1 dead, 4 wounded.
1995 Frontier Middle School Shooting -
3 dead, 1 wounded.
1996 San Diego State University - 3 dead.
1997 Bethel Regional High School Shooting -
2 dead, 2 wounded.
1997 Pearl High School Shooting - 3 dead, 7 wounded.
1997 Heath High School Shooting - 3 dead, 5 wounded.
1998 Westside Middle School Massacre -
5 dead, 10 wounded.
1998 Parker Middle School Shooting - 1 dead, 3 wounded.
1998 Thurston High School Shooting -
4 dead, 23 wounded.
1999 Columbine High School Massacre -
15 dead, 21 wounded.
1999 Heritage High School Shooting - 6 wounded.
2001 Santana High School Shooting - 2 dead, 13 wounded.
2001 Granite Hills High School - 5 wounded.
2005 Red Lake Massacre - 10 dead, 7 wounded.
2006 Amish School Shooting - 6 dead, 3 wounded.
2007 Virginia Tech Massacre - 33 dead, 25 wounded.
2007 Success Tech Academy Shooting -
1 dead, 4 wounded.
2008 Northern Illinois University Shooting -
6 dead, 21 wounded.
2010 University of Alabama Shooting -
3 dead, 3 wounded.
2012 Oikos University Shooting - 7 dead, 3 wounded.
2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting (if real) -
28 dead, 2 wounded.
2013 Santa Monica Shooting - 6 dead, 4 wounded.
2013 Sparks Middle School Shooting - 2 dead, 2 wounded.
2014 Isla Vista Killings - 7 dead, 13 wounded.
2014 Marysville (WA) Pilchuck High School shooting -
5 dead, 3 wounded.

(There were school shootings in the 1800s
and early 1900s, but they were all related to:
      accidents,
      jilted lovers,
      gang violence, or
      students mad at the principal.
And almost all involved only 1 or 2 incidents.)

WE WERE MUCH BETTER OFF
WITH PRAYER AND BIBLE IN SCHOOLS!

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 


MOUNTAIN OF TROUBLE FOR EVOLUTION
is
MOUNTING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION / FLOOD

Evolution states that
Earth's continents were formed about
2 1/2 BILLION years ago.

But we see that continents and mountains constantly erode
by rivers carrying them into the sea.

So evolution claims that mountains still exist
because uplift (orogeny)
is constantly replacing them from below.

Then mountains would have been
eroded into the ocean and uplifted
many many many times in 2 1/2 BILLION years.

Evolution says, "Yeah. So what?"

Then why are there layers of sedimentary rocks
supposedly BILLIONS and BILLIONS of years old
still found in the mountains?

Evolution: "Oops!"


Creation / Flood account
maintains that sedimentary layers
formed during the Flood.
Mountains arose from Earth's orogenous zones
and carried with them sedimentary layers.
And now you see this EVIDENCE
of sedimentary layers in the mountains.
All of which are only several thousand years old.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

MILLER / UREY "FRANKENSTEIN" EXPERIMENT

CAN YOU TELL WHICH IS WHICH?

Both were trying to make live things from dead things...

BOTH ARE BASED ON ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBILITIES.
ONLY GOD CAN BRING LIFE FROM DEAD STUFF.
(See Genesis 2:7)

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

CREATURES THAT DEFY EVOLUTION
(a DVD series by Jobe Martin)

Written by Clifford Scott

MELIPONA BEE AND VANILLA BEANS

In the early 1520s, Hernando Cortez (also known as Hernan Cortes) arrived in what is today Vera Cruz, Mexico. The Aztec Emperor Montezuma (or Moctezuma) greeted Cortez and offered him a delicious drink of "Chocolatl" that was flavored with vanilla. Hernando loved it! Well, who wouldn't? So of course he killed Montezuma and took some of the vanilla orchids back to Spain in 1528.

But the orchids refused to produce vanilla beans. Cortez was not happy about this. He returned to Mexico in 1530. But he found things in the state of Vera Cruz in the state of anarchy. He returned again to Spain in 1541. Six years later he died a bitter old man (possibly because he had no sweet vanilla).

In 1836 Belgian botanist Charles Morren discovered that only the little Melipona Bee could pollinate the vanilla orchid. Five years later a slave named Edmond Albius found he could pollinate the orchids by hand using a bamboo toothpick.

Vanilla then became readily available to the whole world. And aren't we glad!

The point of this story is that the Vanilla Orchid and the Melipona Bee were DESIGNED for each other. They fit together like hand in glove, duck in water, ants in aardvark.

There are those who disagree. Evolutionists claim that the Melipona and the Vanilla evolved side by side together. It's not enough to believe in the unbelievable theory of evolution. We now have to believe that incredibly complex symbiotic relationships evolved together!

One of the responders in "Yahoo Answers" (THE official word on everything!) states that Jobe Martin basically is unqualified to make the statements he does about the Melipona / Vanilla connection.
I beg to differ.

Jobe Martin was once an evolutionist. He majored in biology at Bucknell University, then in 1966 he graduated from the University of Pittsburgh Dental School. In 1971 he taught at Baylor College of Dentistry. He then received a master's degree from Dallas Theological Seminary in 1986. He spent over 20 years studying the topic of Creation / Evolution.

Jobe Martin originally believed in Darwinian evolution. Some of his Christian students at Baylor dental college challenged him to prove that evolution was a correct and accurate explanation for the origin of the earth and all of its discreet life forms.

As Jobe Martin studied all of this in order to "educate" these students in evolution, he began to see that there was in reality very little scientific evidence to back up evolution's version of origins. He found that most of the world is heavily indoctrinated from their earliest schooling to believe in an earth that was formed BILLIONS of years ago in the so-called "Big Bang." And to believe that life evolved from non-life, "abiogenesis." Over the course of the next decade, Jobe Martin became an expert on the subject, and has uncovered countless pieces of evidence that the "Big Bang," "abiogenesis," and a "billions-of-years-old earth" are simply not provable, and are in fact, quite "incredible."

He obviously has the benefit of both the evolutionist's as well as the Creationist's viewpoint.

So not only does he show
"Creatures That Defy Evolution"
He is also the
"Creationist That Defies Evolutionists!"

 


 

Jobe Martin has an excellent DVD series on
"CREATURES THAT DEFY EVOLUTION"
on his website,
"THE EVOLUTION OF A CREATIONIST"
Note: This link will take you to a new website.
When you are finished with Jobe Martin's website,
please click your browser's "back" button
to return to Clifford Scott's website.

 


 

THE WONDER FROG

      The gastric-brooding frogs or platypus frogs (Rheobatrachus) were a genus of ground-dwelling frogs native to Queensland in eastern Australia. The genus consisted of only two species, both of which became extinct in the mid-1980s. The genus was unique because it contained the only two known frog species that incubated the prejuvenile stages of their offspring in the stomach of the mother...
      Scientists at the University of Newcastle (Australia) and University of New South Wales announced in March 2013 that the frog would be the subject of a cloning attempt, referred to as the Lazarus Project, to resurrect the species. Embryos were successfully cloned...
      The causes of the gastric-brooding frogs' extinction are not clearly understood, but habitat loss and degradation, pollution, and some diseases may have contributed...
      What makes these frogs unique among all frog species is their form of parental care. Following external fertilization by the male, the female would take the eggs into her mouth and swallow them. It is not clear whether the eggs were laid on the land or in the water, as it was never observed before their extinction. *

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gastric-brooding_frog

 

There are a number of things to consider here:

1. How could this frog have evolved?
The first time Mama Frog decided to eat her eggs -
no baby frogs - end of species.
Other creatures eat their young (Guppies)
and when they do, the eaten babies are dead and gone.

2. Why would scientists refer to their project as the "Lazarus Project" ?
Lazarus is a person from the Bible.
Science does not believe that
science and the Bible can coexist.

3. Genetic manipulation is most likely one of the things
that brought on the Flood of Noah's time.

4. Since when have evolution scientists been concerned
with things that can't be observed?

NO WAY DID THIS FROG EVOLVE!
IT WAS DEFINITELY DESIGNED!!

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHOW YOUR STUDENTS A
WONDER FROG

SIMILAR TO THE ONE PICTURED ABOVE,
CLICK ON THE PHOTO FOR ORDERING INFORMATION.

 


 


THE GREEN SEA SLUG

Evolution takes another big hit with
the Green Sea Slug.

This marine creature known as a
"Nudibranch"
(pronounced, noo-duh-brank)
eats sea anemonies that normally shoot out
cells that sting its predator
thus keeping the anemony safe.
However, the nudibranch eats the anemony
and its stinging cells.
Then the nudibranch stores these stolen weapons
and uses them in its own defense!

How in evolution's name can this happen?

There is no way this could happen by chance!

 


 


CLEANER FISH AND BIRDS

Fish are well known for swimming around
and eating smaller fish and shrimp.
So why do some fish open their mouths
and let other fish or shrimp clean their teeth?
Why not just eat the fish or shrimp
that is trying to get a free meal?


And why does the Nile crocodile
open its mouth and let the Egyptian plover bird
come in and get a free meal
while it cleans the crocodile's teeth?

 

There is no way any of this could happen by chance!

 


 


BOMBARDIER BEETLE

The bombardier beetle manufactures four chemicals:

                                    1. hydroquinone.
                                    2. hydrogen peroxide.
                                    3. an inhibitor.
                                    4. an anti-inhibitor.

The first three chemicals are somehow manufactured
and stored in a special compartment near the beetle's rear end.
The fourth chemical, the anti-inhibitor,
is stored in a second compartment adjacent to the first.

When a predator attacks the
bombardier beetle
it shoots these chemicals out through two combustion tubes.
The anti-inhibitor stops the inhibitor
and the chemicals ignite in a boiling hot explosion
right in the predator's face!

How could all this complexity have
"evolved"
over millions of years?

Imagine a beetle "evolving" into a bombardier ...
The first time the chemicals are mixed
without the exact right sequence
or
without the specially designed chambers ...
the beetle blows her butt off
and that's the end of the beetle!

All of this had to be designed from the start
or there would be no bombardier beetle
and you would not be reading this page right now!

 

(Images my be subject to copyright)

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

DINOSAUR AND MAN

EVOLUTION STATES
THAT DINOSAURS BECAME EXTINCT
ABOUT 65 MILLION YEARS AGO *

AND THAT MAN FIRST APPEARED
ABOUT 200,000 YEARS AGO #

* http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dinosaurs/extinct.html
# http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm

This means that man and dinosaurs could not
have existed at the same time.

In order to cast GREAT DOUBT on this assumption,
we must go back to the mid-1800s
when two paleontologists
were in a race to see who could find
the most dinosaur skeletons.

The two were Othniel C Marsh and Edward D Cope.
The race became known as "The Bone Wars."

In 1879 Mr Marsh quickly named
and described a new dinosaur
the "Brontosaurus"
which was not complete in that it was missing a head.
Othniel Marsh placed a "Camarasaurus" head
on his "Brontosaurus."

This wrong head was not conclusively
shown to be incorrect until the 1970s.
This means that for almost 100 years
people thought of the "Brontosaurus"
as the most famous sauropod dinosaur.

The "Brontosaurus" was everywhere -
in magazines, books, encyclopedias,
movies, comic books, songs, advertising, etc.
"Brontosaurus" had a snub nose and drug his tail.

He is on the logo for Sinclair Oil Corp. **


He is in the Flintstones Cartoons. **


Now we need to go to Peru,
to the city of Ica on the west coast.

A Peruvian doctor named Javier Cabrera
has collected andesite stones
that have been carved with drawings of dinosaurs
and other images that are quite interesting.
Dr Cabrera purchased several stones
from local villagers in the 1960s.
His father also had a collection
from as early as the 1930s.
As soon as the local people
saw that there was a market for these stones,
they started carving some themselves
and trying to sell them to Cabrera.
Because of this,
skeptics claimed that all the stones were faked.
However, the fakes are very crude
and obviously carved with a hacksaw.
The originals have desert varnish on them
which also covers the carvings.
Desert varnish consists of clay and trace elements
along with organic matter.
It takes a very long time
for desert varnish to build up on rocks.

Now here is the interesting thing.
One of the stones
shows a man riding a sauropod dinosaur!

And the dinosaur does not have
the snub nose of "Brontosaurus"
which is what one would expect
if the stones had been faked in the 1930s,
the 1940s, the 1950s, or the 1960s!

The dinosaur has the pointed snout of Apatosaurus.


ICA STONE WITH MAN RIDING APATOSAURUS **

There are THOUSANDS of these stones from Ica Peru!

No wonder that evolutionists
try to claim they are faked...

The "Ica Stones" are
devastating
to the THEORY of evolution!

The "Ica Stones" are just ONE example
of dinosaur and man being contemporaries.
Another example are the ceramic figurines
found in Acambaro Mexico.


DINOSAUR FIGURES FROM ACAMBARO MEXICO

Waldemar Julsrud
immigrated to Mexico in the early 1900s
to escape what he saw happening in Germany.
He wanted nothing to do with Nazis
so he moved his family to Mexico.
In 1944 he discovered
some ceramic figurines in the dirt
near Acambaro Mexico,
a city between Guadalajara and Mexico City.
Altogether over 30,000 objects were found.
Among them
were men and creatures of various kinds.
Some of these creatures are quite strange,
but some of them are definitely dinosaurs!


Acambaro Figurines **

Mr Julsrud had locals help him dig up these figurines,
and he paid them one peso each.
So of course
evolutionists claim that the figurines are fake!
I don't blame them.
The figurines make the THEORY of evolution extinct!

If you would like to show your students
what the Acambaro Dinosaur Figurines look like,
or what the Ica Stones look like,
you can order a reproduction made by Clifford Scott
by clicking on the "Acambaro Figurines" photo above.

Besides the Ica Stones and the Acambaro Figurines
showing that dino and man were contemporaries
we also have the Dragon.


THE DRAGON

The ubiquitous Dragon is found everywhere.
There are Dragon legends and images
in countries around the world,
from Austria to Zaire:


WORLD DRAGONS

Click the stamp above
to see pix of Dragons from around the World


Some evolutionists claim that if a few dinosaurs
were found living today
it would not harm the theory of evolution.

If this were really true
evolutionists would not be so insistent
in their claim
that dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago.

This is obviously NOT true.
It would be like me telling you that if the color GREEN
were discovered
it would not harm my claim
that RED is the ONLY color in the world!

Don't believe this lie.
After all, they're lying about almost everything else.


CONCLUSION
DINOSAURS ARE OLDER THAN MAN...
BUT ONLY A FEW HOURS OLDER!

Dinosaurs were created on day six of Creation,
a few hours before man,
who was the crowning act of God's Creation!

** (Images may be subject to copyright)

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

COULD DINOSAURS REALLY HAVE
TURNED INTO BIRDS?

Evolution claims that Dinosaurs
have evolved into modern day Birds.
Let's examine this claim and see if it will fly...

FEATHERS

The second thing people notice about birds
(after the fact that they can fly)
is that they have feathers.

So for this dino-to-bird event,
we need scales to turn into feathers.
Richard Dawkins claims,
"Feathers are modified reptilian scales." *

If you look closely
(microscopically)
at scales and feathers
you will discover that feathers are
WAY
more complex than scales!

This means a great increase in information.
But evolution says there is no problem with this.
They maintain that given enough time
(evolution's magic ingredient)
that this could happen.

However, scales are just folds in skin.
Feathers are very complex
and grow from follicles similar to the way hair grows.

* R. Dawkins, Climbing Mount Improbable (Harmondsworth, Middlesex,
England: Penguin Books, 1996), p.113

 

But let's look at some more
differences
between dinos and birds.

 

LUNGS

Here is a dino lung.

Compare this with a bird lung.

You will notice that the bird lung is designed
to work best while traveling through the air.

You will never see a bird
land on a branch after a long flight
and huff and puff trying to catch its breath.

 

FINGERS

Birds have fingers 2, 3, and 4
predominant in their wings.
Dinosaurs have fingers 1, 2, and 3
predominant in their hands.

It appears that birds have flipped
the flying fickle finger of fate at dinosaurs.

 

ARCHAEOPTERYX
once evolution's cherished "missing link"
between dinosaurs and birds
has turned out to be a true bird
and not a reptile at all.
The fact that it had teeth didn't prove it was reptilian.
Many extinct birds had teeth.
Archaeopteryx has turned and
bit
evolution where it hurts.

 


"The feathered dinosaur pictures are simply
imaginary
and have no place outside of
SCIENCE FICTION."

S.L. Olson open letter to Dr Peter Raven


"The therapod (dinosaur) origin of birds,
in my opinion,
will be the greatest
EMBARRASSMENT
of paleontology of the 20th century."

Alan Feduccia - University of North Carolina


RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

THREE THINGS ABOUT THE MOON THAT PUZZLE NASA

But Even This Girl Can Figure Out!
*



1. THE PUZZLE OF THE MOON'S ORIGIN

Scientists offer three major theories
to account for the moon in orbit around Earth.
All three are in serious trouble.

One theory says that the moon
may have been born alongside
the Earth out of the same cosmic dust cloud
about 4.6 billion years ago.
However, the moon and the Earth
are composed of some similar
but other very different materials.

Another theory states that
the moon was the Earth's child,
that it was ripped out of the Pacific Ocean basin.
But this is allegedly at the same time
that the Earth is supposed to be gathering
material for its formation
from the solar system ...
how can it
gather IN and rip OUT
at the same time?

The third theory has the moon being "captured"
by the Earth's gravitational field ages ago.
But this has ENORMOUS difficulties
with celestial mechanics,
especially since the moon's orbit is quite
circular.

NASA scientist Dr Robin Brett says,
"It seems much easier to explain the
non-existence
of the moon than its existence."


But this girl reads in her Bible
that God created the moon...
and she believes it.



2. THE PUZZLE OF THE MOON'S AGE

The first rock that Neil Armstrong picked up
turned out to be 3.6 billion years old.
Others were 4.3, 4.5, 4.6, and even
5.3 billion years old!
But the oldest rocks on Earth
are ONLY 3.7 billion years old.
Based on this evidence,
some scientists have concluded
that the moon was formed among the stars
long before our sun was born.


But this girl reads in her Bible
that God created the sun AND the moon
on the 4th day of Creation
only about 6000 years ago...
and she believes it.

She is tempted to say that those scientists
have a screw loose
and that they need to seriously rethink
their dating methods...
But she doesn't.



3. THE PUZZLE OF THE MOON'S
GLASSY SURFACE

Lunar explorations have revealed that
much of the moon's surface
is covered with a glassy glaze,
which would indicate that the moon's surface
has been scorched
by an unknown source of intense heat.
As one scientist put it,
the moon is "paved with glass."
The experts' analysis shows that this
did not
result from massive meteor impacts.
One explanation stated that
an intense solar flare,
of awesome proportions,
scorched the moon some 30,000 years ago.


This girl reads in her Bible in Genesis 1:16
that on the 4th day of Creation
God made a greater light
(the sun)
to rule the day,
and a lesser light
(the moon)
to rule the night.

She reasons with her God-given brain
that the moon would obviously
have been created to be
reflective
since it emits no light of its own,
and she marvels at how others
can't see this obvious fact!


* (Images may be subject to copyright)

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

DESIGN DEMANDS A DESIGNER

The concept known as ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN has been around for over two millenniums, going back to a Hebrew work by Rabbi Akiva ben Yossef, 50-135 A.D.

Scientists worked under the premise of Divine Creation for thousands of years and had no problem. The five greatest physicists in history, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, James Clerk Maxwell, Michael Faraday, and J. J. Thompson, were each outspoken in their conviction and faith that a Creator placed the universe here.

But then came modern man who devised an origin of things that did not include a Creator. However, when modern man notices that the Ford Pinto and the Space Shuttle are both made of Metal and Plastic and Rubber and Glass, he does not jump to the conclusion that the Space Shuttle evolved from the Pinto. Why? Because he has read the history about the design and manufacture of each vehicle. We could excuse someone like an Aborygmy thinking such a thing when seeing these two vehicles for the first time. (Aborygmy is Cliff's coined word for any or all of the uncivilized peoples around the world who have never been exposed to modern technology. It's a [sorry] attempt to avoid offending any one group).

But modern man knows better. The Space Shuttle did NOT evolve from the Ford Pinto. The two vehicles do not even share a common designer. Henry Ford's company built the Pinto. NASA and its subsidiaries built the Space Shuttle. As a matter of fact, the only thing the two craft have in common is that they both tend to explode.

Some theoretical day in the far distant future when metallic vehicles are no longer in use, researchers in the field of Techno-Archeology will find evidences of the Pinto and the Space Shuttle. The History Book will tell of these two different craft and who designed and built each one. But Techno-Archeologists, who declare that the History Book is just a bunch of myths, legends, and superstitions, will come to the conclusion that the Space Shuttle evolved from the Pinto because the Space Shuttle is obviously more highly advanced. Or possibly the Techno-Archeologists will decide that both artifacts had a common "ancestor." However, those who have read the History Book will know that Ford designed and built the Pinto and that NASA designed and built the Space Shuttle. And yet, they will be ridiculed and derided by the Techno-Archeologists because they are not using "science," but insist on using the "myths, legends, and superstitions" (read: "facts") from the History Book.

And yet, "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." -George Santayana, 1863-1952.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

TED TALKS: 2002

(TED = Technology Entertainment Design)

Robert Full: Engineering and Evolution

In February of 2002 in Monterey, California
Robert Full presented a talk in which he stated,
"Evolution works on the 'Just Good Enough' principle
not on the 'Perfecting' principle...

I would have to strongly disagree!

A giraffe's heart and vascular system is 'Perfect'
It's not 'Just Good Enough.'
If a giraffe bends down to drink,
he does not get a terrible headache
because the sponge under his brain is absorbing
'Just Enough' blood
so his head doesn't explode!

No.
The sponge absorbs blood
'Perfectly'
so the giraffe can drink in great comfort.

Then when he is finished drinking,
and raises his head WAY UP
to its normal position,
he doesn't go wobbling around
because the sponge released 'Just Enough' blood
to barely maintain his senses!

No.
The sponge releases the 'Perfect' amount of blood
so he is in complete control
of his reflexes and muscles
and can run off quickly to avoid the lion
that's in mid-leap aiming for his throat!


Next Robert Full compares and contrasts
an engineer trying to build an automobile
that must start out tiny then grow into full size
while being fully functional at every stage.

Then to top it off,
the automobile must have inside it
a factory that manufactures more automobiles!

The audience laughs at this because it is absurd
to think that an engineer could do this.

I am not sure exactly what his point was,
but this illustrates to me how
incredibly ridiculous
it is to think that human beings
(who can do all those things)
just evolved by accident !!!

Following this illustration Robert states,
"Animals appear hopelessly complex.
There is no detailed history of design plans.
You can't go look it up anywhere."

I would have to partially disagree.

No, there aren't any detailed design plans.
Those are in the mind of our Almighty Creator.
But you can look it up somewhere...
Try chapter one in the book of Genesis:
"In the beginning
God created the heavens and the earth...
Then God said, 'Let Us make man in Our image,
according to Our likeness...'"

THAT SAYS A LOT !!!

Humans are created in God's image
according to His likeness.

THAT'S why we are incredibly complex!

Evolution maintains that nature was NOT designed,
but Robert Full ends this talk by stating,
"We must preserve nature's designs,
or else these secrets will be lost forever."

This website is dedicated
to preserve the acts of nature's DESIGNER
so that His mighty deeds
will not be lost on this world forever!

Tell others about this.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

TED TALKS: 2006

Michael Shermer: On Strange Beliefs

In February of 2006 in Monterey, California
Michael Shermer
presented the topic of Strange Beliefs.

He talked about how we hold strange beliefs
from aliens to crop circles.
At one point he showed a Sidney Harris cartoon
where two scientists are studying a formula
on a blackboard.
One scientist remarks to the other,
"I think you should be more explicit here in step two"
as he points to the words,
"Then a Miracle Occurs"
in the middle of the formula.
(You can view the cartoon at
sciencecartoonsplus.com)

Michael then states that this
"completely dismantles
the Intelligent Design argument."
"You can say a miracle occurs,
it's just that it doesn't explain anything."

This is well and good.
EXCEPT
that this also applies to evolution's THEORY
of where the big bang came from
and how life came about from water and rocks.

So the cartoon
COMPLETELY DISMANTLES
THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION
AS WELL!

Basically the THEORY of evolution states,
"All matter is in a very dense point,
AND THEN A MIRACLE OCCURS
and this matter explodes and creates the Universe!"
"It rains on the rocks,
AND THEN A MIRACLE OCCURS
and life begins!"

NO MICHAEL SHERMER,
YOU CAN'T HAVE IT ONLY YOUR WAY!
IF A MIRACLE OCCURRED
TO HAVE A CREATOR MAKE THE UNIVERSE,
THEN A MIRACLE OCCURRED
TO CREATE LIFE FROM WATER AND ROCKS!

The Miller / Urey "Frankenstein" experiment
does not explain how life began.
It only showed how a very controlled experiment
produced some gooey stuff
that contained several amino acids.
It did NOT show how these amino acids
could produce life.

There is a really BIG step between these two things.
Only God can make life from dead stuff.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

TED TALKS: 2009

Catherine Mohr:
Surgery's Past Present and Robotic Future

In February of 2009 in Long Beach, California
Catherine Mohr gave a talk
about surgeries in the distant past.

She showed an ancient skull
with a square hole cut into it (trepanation)
and explained that many hundreds of skulls
have been found all over the world
with evidence of trepanation
dating back five to ten thousand years ago.

"Imagine you're a healer in a stone age village
and you have some guy
that you're not quite sure what's wrong with him..."
This is an assumption
based on evolutionary brainwashing.
This is assuming that mankind's ancient surgeons
were not smart enough
to know what was wrong with a patient.
"...he's got some seizure disorder
and you don't understand this..."
Another assumption
"...but you think to yourself,
'I'm not quite sure what's wrong with this guy,
but maybe if I cut a hole in his head I can fix it.'"

At this point there is laughter from the audience
because the implication is that the ancient surgeon
is cutting a hole in the guy's head
to see if that will cure him.
This implication is further directed by her next statement
that we're not sure if this hole was cut
for religious reasons
or for therapeutic reasons.
She then finishes this segment by stating
that there is evidence that these patients
survived the procedure.

If the patients survived,
then it was not simply a procedure,
but rather an operation!

And the ancient surgeon knew what he was doing!

THIS FITS IN PERFECTLY
WITH THE CREATION ACCOUNT!
Man was Created perfect.
He had great knowledge.
Our seemingly great knowledge of today
is quite possibly inferior to ancient man's knowledge!

THIS IS CONTRARY TO EVOLUTION'S CLAIM
THAT ANCIENT MAN WAS A
BARELY INTELLIGENT CREATURE
SLIGHTLY BETTER THAN THE APES !!!

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

TED TALKS: 2011

David Christian: Big History

In February of 2011 in Long Beach, California
David Christian gave a TED Talk entitled,

"The History of Our World in 18 Minutes."

In this talk David used scrambled eggs to illustrate the
2nd Law of Thermodynamics
(ENTROPY)
which states that everything in the Universe
tends toward disorder.
Then he pointed out that the Earth is very complex.
(So far so good.)
However, according to David,
the way the Earth became more complex is because of
"Goldilocks Conditions"
conditions that were not too hot or too cold, but just right,
threshold moments in which
slightly more complex things appeared.
Unbelievable! But look it up for yourself at:
http://www.ted.com/talks/david_christian_big_history.html

HOW IRONICALLY APPROPRIATE FOR DAVID TO USE
A FAIRY TALE TERM
TO ILLUSTRATE THE FAIRY TALE OF EVOLUTION!!!

If the above link is no longer good,
check out the talk on YOU TUBE:
You Tube: David Christian: Big History


After watching many TED Talks
the author of this webpage is convinced that
TED
actually stands for
Technology Evolution Deception

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

DISTANT GALAXIES
Do They Prove An Old Universe ?

There are galaxies in the Universe
that are so distant
that their light appears to have been traveling for
BILLIONS and BILLIONS
of years before it could be viewed on Planet Earth.

So, doesn't this mean that the Universe is
BILLIONS and BILLIONS
of years old?

Let's see what the Bible says about stars,
which would include distant galaxies:

Genesis 1:14-16 states,
"Then God said, 'Let there be lights
in the expanse of the heavens
to separate the day from the night ...
to give light on the earth.'
... God made the two great lights,
the greater light to govern the day,
and the lesser light to govern the night;
He made the stars also."

This could indicate that God made the stars
in the remote past
not necessarily on Day 4 of Creation Week.

But we don't need to limit God in this manner.
He could have "made the stars also"
on Day 4 along with the Sun and Moon.
He could have made the stars
AND
all their light along the pathways to the Earth!

In other words, God made the stars with apparent age.

After all, He created Adam and Eve with apparent age.
When God made Adam and Eve,
they were not embryos that had to grow up
before the got married.

When they got together to fill the Earth
as God commanded
they were only one day old.
But they were old enough to consummate their marriage.

They had been created with the apparent age of late teens or early twenties.


When I was a kid,
I made a town layout for my Matchbox cars.
I glued on model trees and houses.
I did NOT glue on seeds and stacks of lumber!
I wanted to play with and enjoy my town right then.
Not sit around for fifty years
and wait for the trees to grow
and the houses to be built.

It is logical to think that God did the same thing
when He created STARS and ANIMALS and HUMANS.

This also answers the age-old question,
"Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"
Obviously it was the chicken.

On Day 5 of Creation Week
the Bible says that God created fish and birds,
NOT caviar and omelets!

EVERYTHING HAD APPARENT AGE
WHEN FIRST CREATED !

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

COMETS AND THE OORT CLOUD

Originally I was not going to say anything about Comets
because the Oort Cloud is one of those
"And Then A Miracle Occurs"
kind of things that evolutionists have made up.

The Oort Cloud is the invention of Jan Hendrick Oort
a Dutch astronomer who lived between 1900 and 1992.
Here is what Wikipedia has to say about the Oort Cloud:
"The Oort cloud...is a spherical cloud
of predominantly icy planetesimals (Comets)
that is believed to surround the Sun
at a distance up to 50,000 AU, nearly a light-year."
(emphasis ours)

However
when I read what evolutionists have to say about
Comets and the Oort Cloud
it is so bizzare that I can not keep my fingers still!
They HAVE to type.
So here it is...

The fact is that there are short-period Comets
orbiting the sun.
A short-period Comet
is one that orbits the sun in less than 200 years.
Short-period Comets lose 0.5% of their mass
each time they come near the sun.
Therefore
after several hundred orbits around the sun
short-period Comets disintegrate.

At the present time
there are about 100 short-period Comets
in our solar system
many of which have a period of less than 20 years.
In other words, they orbit the sun in less than 20 years.

Comets are believed to have originated
at the same time as the solar system.

Therefore the fact that they still exist
points to a "young" solar system.

In order to have short-period Comets
in a really old universe
Jan Oort came up with his Oort Cloud THEORY.
The Oort Cloud is then essentially a "nursery"
where Comets are "born"
but remember
the Oort Cloud is just a
THEORY.

Evolutionists don't like anything
that shakes their THEORY
so this is what they have to say
about this whole short-period Comet problem:

"Creationism's main argument
seems to be that we don't have
close-up photos of the Oort Cloud and, therefore,
cannot be 100% certain that it really exists!
Sorry fellas, but if you want to use this comet argument
it is up to you to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt,
that the Oort Cloud and other sources don't exist!" *

Can you believe that?!
How can anyone prove the non-existence of something?

We could turn this around on the evolutionists
and other atheists
and demand that they prove
beyond a reasonable doubt
that God does not exist!

These things can't be done!

You can't prove the existence or non-existence
of the Oort Cloud
because it can't be seen
or photographed
or tested
or experienced
in any way shape or form!

And that is what SCIENCE is all about.

Google this:
"actual telescopic photograph of Oort cloud"
and you will get close to 100,000 results.
I did not take the time to look at ALL of them
but the first page of results contained only
ARTISTS' CONCEPTIONS
of the Oort Cloud.
If there was a real actual telescopic photograph
of the Oort Cloud
it would be on the first page.

Let me just say
my Google search does not mean
that there is NO Oort Cloud.
But if the Oort Cloud cannot be photographed
then it is just a
THEORY.

So let me repeat this:

IF YOU CAN'T
SEE IT
PHOTOGRAPH IT
TEST IT
EXPERIENCE IT
REPEAT IT
IT'S NOT SCIENCE!

So don't teach it to our kids as
SCIENTIFIC FACT

* www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/howgood-yea.html#proof3
(Fourth paragraph)

Just in case the website removes
this totally ridiculous statement
you can view a screen shot of it
HERE
I have outlined the statement
in yellow on the screen shot.


OORT CLOUD VS KUIPER BELT

Wikipedia has this to say about the Kuiper Belt:

"The Kuiper belt was initially thought to be the main repository for periodic comets, those with orbits lasting less than 200 years. However, studies since the mid-1990s have shown that the classical belt is dynamically stable, and that comets' true place of origin is the scattered disc, a dynamically active zone created by the outward motion of Neptune 4.5 billion years ago... The Kuiper belt should not be confused with the hypothesized Oort cloud, which is a thousand times more distant."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_belt
(emphasis ours)

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

SATURN: BIG PLANET - BIG PROBLEMS
for evolution


Saturn backlit by the Sun, taken by the Cassini probe

Saturn's rings appear to be young.

"The theory that explained how Saturn's rings could persist through 4.6 billion years of solar system evolution also explained why Saturn was the only planet that could have a ring. Then those theories had to be revised to account for the rings of Uranus. The revisions implied that Jupiter would not have a ring. Now Jupiter has been found to have a ring and we have to invent a theory to explain it." *

When Voyager discovered thousands of rings around Saturn, evolution theory had a problem. NASA's conclusion: "No theory has yet been developed that explains how all three of these planets (Saturn, Uranus, Jupiter) could have rings for so long."
IE, 4.6 billion years. *

* Tippets, M., Voyager scientists on dilemma's horns, CRSQ 16(3):185, 1979.

Instead of coming up with "new theories" all the time
why not just accept that the solar system is young
only a few thousand years old.
Just like the Bible says.

For more information see:
http://creation.com/the-age-and-fate-of-saturns-rings


In 1981-1982 Voyager sent back photos of a
hexagon shape
on Saturn's north pole.

In 2006-2009 Cassini sent back more photos
of Saturn's north pole.
The hexagon was still there!

The hexagonal shape is common in nature
in bee's honeycombs and snowflake formation.
However
who would have expected to see it
in such huge proportions
on our most unusual planet?

This amazing phenomenon
should catch the eye of all Creationists...

"The heavens are telling of the glory of God;
And their expanse is declaring the work of His hands."
Psalm 19:1

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

MATHEMATICS:
MAN-MADE OR INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED?

FIBONACCI SEQUENCE

In mathematics, the Fibonacci numbers or Fibonacci sequence are the numbers in the following sequence: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, ...

By definition, the first two numbers in the Fibonacci sequence are either 1 and 1, or 0 and 1, depending on the chosen starting point of the sequence, and each subsequent number is the sum of the previous two.

The Fibonacci spiral: created by drawing circular arcs connecting the opposite corners of squares in the Fibonacci tiling; this one uses squares of sizes 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, and 34.

Fibonacci numbers also appear in biological settings, such as branching in trees, phyllotaxis (the arrangement of leaves on a stem), the fruit sprouts of a pineapple, the flowering of an artichoke, an uncurling fern and the arrangement of a pine cone's bracts.

THE BEE ANCESTRY CODE

Fibonacci numbers also appear in the pedigrees of idealized honeybees, according to the following rules: If an egg is laid by an unmated female, it hatches a male or drone bee. If, however, an egg was fertilized by a male, it hatches a female. Thus, a male bee always has one parent, and a female bee has two. If one traces the pedigree of any male bee (1 bee), he has 1 parent (1 bee), 2 grandparents, 3 great grandparents, 5 great-great-grandparents, and so on. This sequence of numbers of parents is the Fibonacci sequence.

Leonardo Bonacci (c. 1170 - c. 1250) - known as Fibonacci is considered to be "the most talented Western mathematician of the Middle Ages."

Originally the Fibonacci sequence appeared in Indian mathematics, in connection with Sanskrit prosody. In the Sanskrit tradition of prosody, there was interest in enumerating all patterns of Long syllables that are 2 units of duration, and Short syllables that are 1 unit of duration; counting the different patterns of Long and Short of a given duration results in Fibonacci numbers. *

 

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number

 

OTHER FIBONACCI SEQUENCES IN NATURE


Fibonacci Sequences in Nautilus Shells


Fibonacci Sequences in Galaxies


Fibonacci Sequences in Finger Bones

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

DAVID'S QUESTION

In Psalm 8:3-4
David asks the question,
"When I consider Your heavens, the work of Your fingers,
The moon and the stars, which You have ordained,
What is man that You take thought of him,
And the son of man that You care for him?"

It is easy to think that David is saying
that man is extremely insignificant
when compared to the universe.

While this may be part of what David is saying,
you can also hear David declaring,
"God, You made the entire Universe!
And yet You thought enough of man
that You have taken care of him!
You made a provision for man to be saved
from Eternal Death!"

No wonder that in verse 9 David exclaims,
"O Lord, our Lord,
How majestic is Your name in all the earth!"

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

SCIENCE IN THE BIBLE

An evolutionist once asked me to give him
ONE evidence of science in the Bible -
something that could not have been known
by the people in the times of the Bible.
He then claimed that it could not be done,
that there was not even ONE example.

Well, here are a number of examples
of science in the Bible:

* Job 28:24-25
"For He looks to the ends of the earth,
and sees under the whole heaven;
To make the weight for the winds;
and He weighs the waters by measure."

3000 or 4000 years ago
people could probably have figured out
that water weighs something.
This becomes especially obvious
when a breaker knocks you down in the surf.
But it has only been in the last 300 or so years
that science has determined
that the wind actually weighs something.

* Proverbs 6:6
"Go to the ant, O sluggard,
Observe her ways and be wise..."
Scientists only discovered in the 1600s or 1700s
that worker ants are all female.
Yet Solomon wrote of ants as female
in his Bible book of Proverbs.
Solomon lived about 900 B.C.

* Genesis 22:17
"That in blessing I will bless you,
and in multiplying I will multiply your seed
as the stars of the heaven,
and as the sand which is upon the seashore..."

Only about 3,000 stars can be seen with the naked eye.

The number of stars in the Universe
and the number of grains of sand on the seashore
are only estimates by today's scientists.
But those numbers are close to the same.

A point to remember:
The Bible text was meant to show Abraham
that he would have MANY descendants.

However, the 3000 stars that could be seen
with the naked eye thousands of years ago,
is WAY less than the number of grains of sand
that could have been counted back then!

It would seem that even though
God was in essence telling Abraham
that he would be the father
of a great number of descendants
that He (God) knew (scientifically)
that the number of stars and
the number of grains of sand on the seashores
are basically identical!

* Job 38:31
"Can you bind the chains of the Pleiades,
Or loose the cords of Orion?"

It has only been recently that astronomers
have discovered that
the Pleiades have been bound together for ages,
and that the stars in Orion's belt are moving apart.

* Ecclesiastes 1:6
"The wind goes toward the south,
and turns about unto the north;
It whirls about continually,
and the wind returns again according to his circuits."

People can see that the wind blows,
but to know that it goes in great circles
is not that easy to understand
(except that NOW with satellite photos it IS easy)!

* Job 26:7
"He stretches out the north over empty space
And hangs the earth on nothing."

The ancients believed the earth
was supported on the backs of
giant turtles or elephants or aardvarks,
depending on who you talk to.
But in the book of Job,
God states that He hung the earth on nothing.
He created it out of nothing and hung it on nothing!

This is one POWERFUL God.

***

These are just a few examples
of scientific things that we
suppose
no one in the past could have known.

However, it is well within the realm of possibility
that the ancients
were a lot smarter than we give them credit for!
They may have known about
these scientific things from advanced study
with technology we haven't even dreamed of yet.
Of course, that flies in the face of evolution too!
Evolution maintains that ancient man
was very primitive, akin to apes.
How could he have had advanced technology?

The answer is very simple.
Genesis 1:1 states, "In the beginning,
God created the heavens and the earth."
Read farther and you see that
ancient man was the pinnacle of Creation.
And we technologically "advanced" humans today
are very much degenerated
from that perfection!


 

"The Evolutionist establishment refuses to acknowledge
any such possibility as (Creationism).
They would like to believe
(and would like others to believe)
that every Creationist is merely a religious propagandist
who wants to misuse "science" to lend credence
to his religious presuppositions.
The ironic truth however is that far more often,
it is the Evolutionist who abuses "science"
to market his own atheistic beliefs
and that it is the Creationist who is compelled by
scientific considerations
to the conclusion of an intelligent Designer." *

 

* members.toast.net/puritan/articles/
evolutionisnotscience.htm

 


 

"While the admission of a design for the universe
ultimately raises the question of a
Designer
(a subject outside of science),
the scientific method
does not allow us to
exclude
data which lead to the conclusion that
the universe, life, and man
are based on
design.
To be forced to believe only one conclusion
- that everything in the universe happened by chance -
would violate the very objectivity of science itself." **

 

** 1972 - Werner von Braun
members.toast.net/puritan/articles/
evolutionisnotscience.htm

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

Some Very Handy Words
for the Creationist to Use
When Reading Evolutionary Stories

 

When a Creationist finds an interesting story
written by an evolutionist
and she wants to read it aloud to her students,
the following list of replacement words are quite useful.

1. SOME
2. SEVERAL
3. A FEW THOUSAND

Here is an example:

    "More rains come and wash dirt from the bank of the pond. The dirt settles as mud over the dinosaur bones. This happens for millions of years.
    Slowly, as millions of more years go by, the weather changes. The sun is bright. It shines everywhere. The mud that surrounded the dinosaur bones is dry now too, and nearly as hard as rock.
    Someone discovers these fossilized bones, digs them all up, and takes them to a museum.
    Today in the museums of big cities you can see these bones put together as they were when they were part of real dinosaurs many millions of years ago."

Now here's how the story reads
when you replace the evolutionary words
with words from this handy list:

    "More rains come and wash dirt from the bank of the pond. The dirt settles as mud over the dinosaur bones. This happens for some years.
    Slowly, as several more years go by, the weather changes. The sun is bright. It shines everywhere. The mud that surrounded the dinosaur bones is dry now too, and nearly as hard as rock.
    Someone discovers these fossilized bones, digs them all up, and takes them to a museum.
    Today in the museums of big cities you can see these bones put together as they were when they were part of real dinosaurs a few thousand years ago."

 

1. SOME
2. SEVERAL
3. A FEW THOUSAND

PLEASE USE THESE WORDS FREELY.

THEY ARE NOT COPYRIGHTED.

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

The Probability that Evolution
Actually Happened

"Random events of probability less than
10-50 never happen."
(Emile Borel, 1965)

"More like 10-150."
(William Dembski, 1999)

The probability of racemization process
occuring by random chance is
10-14,184!

"There is more likelihood that
monkeys
will fly out of your ears
than that Life evolved from rocks!"
(Clifford Scott, 2015)


"Overwhelmingly strong proofs of
intelligent and benevolent design
lie around us ...
the atheistic idea is so
nonsensical
that I cannot put it into words."
(Lord Kelvin, 1899)

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


 

WHAT IF...?

WHAT IF evolution were true
and Biblical Creation weren't true?

What would happen to the Biblical Creationist?
What would happen to me?

Well, when I died I would cease to exist
after living a good life
free from the problems that plague those
who have ignored Jesus' commands to
not murder
not commit adultery or fornication
not steal
not lie
and not covet.

BUT

WHAT IF Biblical Creation were true
and evolution weren't true?

What would happen to the evolutionist
who spent their life teaching children
the LIE of evolution?

He would be in BIG trouble!
HUGE trouble!
Jesus says in Matthew 18:6,
"But whoever causes one of these little ones
who believe in Me
to stumble,
it would be better for him to have
a heavy millstone hung around his neck,
and to be drowned in the depth of the sea."

That means that what is actually going to happen
to someone who causes
one of these little ones to stumble,
is going to be WAY worse than drowning!


When you compare the two "WHAT IFS"
the consequences of false Creationism are nothing.
But the consequences of false evolutionism are
HORRENDOUS!!!

Teaching evolution to children (or anyone)
IS JUST NOT WORTH IT!!!!!!!

And remember,
when they find out
you've been lying about evolution
THEY WON'T BELIEVE
ANYTHING ELSE
YOU'VE TAUGHT THEM!

RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


Written by Clifford Scott
Please Feel Free to Copy Anything On This Website
and Pass it Around


CONTACT INFO


Number of People Who Have Found Something Interesting
About the Creation of Our Earth

The above counter just suddenly appeared on this website
after my computer exploded.

Yeah, right!


RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE


Check out Clifford Scott's "Bible Challenges" website
for more interesting ideas!